Why should Adobe Flash become Open Source?

Sooner or later the news of the disappearance of Adobe Flash 2020, but it happens that there are those who want to give it a second chance.

The original idea is to deliver this project to the open source community, with the purpose that from this moment the independent developers are those who are in charge that flash is still in existence and is that for this reason some have asked the question of whether?this makes some sense?

So in this article we mention three reasons in favor and three reasons against Why should Adobe Flash become Open Source?

Finnish developer known as Juha Lindstedt started a somewhat particular campaign the day after Adobe placed him expiration date to flash. For this consumer, Flash represents a very important piece in the history of the internet and its disappearance could mean that future generations would not have access to the past.

The petition that was posted on Githud has gotten over 3700 signatories, that is, people who have bookmarked this post with a star and as far as Lindstedt is concerned, comment that there are numerous reasons very important to be able to preserve it.

And of course, on the Githud page it is explained how there is still a lot of projects in fields such as art or video games where Flash's work proves its worth. On the other hand, there are also some progress in Open Source that, like  gnash o lights park They have been offering alternative ways to continue working with Flash for a long time, which in turn are limited by the closed source and the project owner.

Reasons in favor

We can start with the reasons in favor of Why Adobe Flash should become Open Source? So below we mention three of them:

Keeping Flash for history: As Lindstedt himself had explained, Flash is a technology that not only has been part as one of the pillars of evolution from the web, but is also still used in certain games, experiments, and websites. This kind of conversion to an Open Source project can allow the ability to access that past.

Security improvements: Another advantage that can be favorable to convert Flash to Open Source is found in the fact that all kinds of developers would have the ability to audit and evaluate code to be able to improve it and correct any kind of weak points.

Protection to modern formats: although adobe offers tools to be able to transfer Flash content to other open and more modern modelsIf Flash becomes part of Open Source, there may also be renewed efforts, such as being able to guarantee that this work can be done with some other format that appears after Flash disappears.

Reasons against

Although we have already mentioned reasons in favor of convert Flash to Open Source, one of the main reasons is that it has become a security problem for a large number of users, this and two others can be mentioned:

Security problems: The weaknesses that have been found in this technology have been many, and the fact of giving up the project to Open Source it can be ineffective, so for some Flash it can be very complex to save it and make it a safe alternative.

There are already other options: others like HTML5 have been able to make quite a few features of what Flash offered are obtainable, due to modern technologies.

Browsers don't want Flash: Those responsible for big browsers like Chrome or Firefox, have shown that they are prepared to stop supporting Flash by the last years of 2020 and it seems unlikely that the jump to Open Source will change that idea.